![]() ![]() ![]() Still it can be really simple to use, when you prepare profiles, which are then simple to switch before you drag'n'drop multitude of files. It can also support multitude of useful formats for input and output, including FLAC with full support of tag mappings, also if source folder contains jpeg file with cover and right name, it will automatically embed it to the output.įor WAV and AIFF output it supports processing with high-quality SoX resampler, so you can even use it for batch up or downsampling. Also it's lightning quick, because it is multi-threaded and use all of your CPU cores for simultaneous encoding of files. You can really tweak encoding parameters, if that's desired. ![]() In comparison, XLD use the same Apple's encoder for AAC and has LAME MP3 library built-in, those two are best encoders for respective formats IMO. Also it accepts just WAV, AIFF and CAF input and encode files one by one. Still something like mentioned open-source XLD can bring some further advantages.įor instance if you use OS X "Encode files." among Finder services, it works only for AAC output, no MP3s. Of course, there's no problem with that, just another options depending on what you have available or is more comfortable for you. It converts freely between MP3, M4A/AAC, FLAC, WMA, Opus, Ogg Vorbis, Speex, Monkeys Audio (APE), WavPack, WAV and other formats. What’s wrong with the built in converter set to best quality?What built-in converter?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |